Question 1

What is NCEA AS 91242 about?

Accepted Answer

This is a 4-credit external exam standard (sat in the end-of-year NCEA exam) where you show you understand why some places in the world are more developed than others. You need to know real case studies — actual named countries or places — and use them to explain things like how development is measured, why development differs between places, and what governments or organisations are doing to reduce those differences. The 2025 exam focused on strategies for reducing differences in development, and you needed two real-world examples to do well.

Question 2

What do students need to do for AS 91242?

Accepted Answer

1. Learn what 'development' means — it covers people's standard of living and quality of life, including economic, social, and political factors. 2. Understand how development is measured — things like GDP, HDI, literacy rates, and life expectancy — and know their limitations. 3. Study why development differs between places — natural factors (like climate or resources) and human/cultural factors (like history or governance). 4. Study strategies that governments or NGOs use to reduce differences in development — for example, foreign aid, microfinance, trade agreements, or education programmes. 5. Use at least two real, named case study locations in your answers — one strategy per location is not enough for higher grades; you need two locations with specific evidence. 6. Use correct geography vocabulary and concepts in your explanations, not just general knowledge. 7. Write explanations (not just descriptions) — show how and why things happen, not just what they are.

Question 3

What's the difference between Achieved, Merit, and Excellence for AS 91242?

Accepted Answer

Achieved: You explain at least one strategy for reducing differences in development and include some real case study evidence. Your writing tends to be more descriptive than analytical, and you might only properly cover one location rather than two. Merit: You explain two strategies in detail, one for each of two named locations. You clearly explain how each strategy actually improved development and reduced the gap between places. Your case study evidence is specific and detailed throughout. Excellence: You fully explain two strategies across two named case study locations with different development levels. Your answer is analytical and shows real insight — you explain clear outcomes, link ideas together, and use geographic terminology accurately. Your case study evidence is woven throughout your answer rather than added as an afterthought.

Question 4

What mistakes do students typically make in AS 91242?

Accepted Answer

1. Only writing about one location — you must use two named places to reach Merit or Excellence. 2. Writing descriptively (just saying what a strategy is) instead of explaining how it actually reduced differences in development. 3. Giving a detailed strategy for one location but only a vague or general point for the second location. 4. Writing about gender differences in development instead of differences between locations — this does not answer the question. 5. Not including specific case study evidence — general statements without named places or real data will not score well. 6. Leaving out geographic terminology and concepts, which are needed for Excellence. 7. Not explaining the outcomes of the strategies — you need to show what actually changed or improved as a result.

Development differences

Your assessment resources

Videos & study resources

More in this subject

Other Geography standards · Level 2 · Year 12

Next year — Geography Level 3 · Year 13

Foundations — Geography Level 1 · Year 11

Related standards