Question 1

What is NCEA AS 91466 about?

Accepted Answer

You need to investigate a real nutritional problem that affects New Zealand society—like sugar in drinks, food poverty, or lack of cooking skills. You'll explain what the issue is, use data and evidence to show why it's happening and what's changing, and describe how it impacts people's health and wellbeing. The key is finding and understanding the connections between the issue and the wider factors that influence it (like money, culture, education, or the environment).

Question 2

What do students need to do for AS 91466?

Accepted Answer

1. Choose a specific nutritional issue affecting New Zealand (e.g. food security, over-consumption of sugary drinks, under-nutrition, lack of cooking skills) 2. Explain what the issue is and why it matters to people's health and wellbeing in Aotearoa 3. Use both numbers and real-world information to show trends, patterns, and what's causing the problem 4. Link the issue to broader factors like economics, culture, education, the environment, and social circumstances (determinants of health) 5. Consider different perspectives—including attitudes, values, and the role of stakeholders like schools, government, and food companies

Question 3

What's the difference between Achieved, Merit, and Excellence for AS 91466?

Accepted Answer

Achieved: You explain the nutritional issue clearly, use data to support your explanation of trends and causes, and describe how it affects New Zealand's wellbeing. Merit: You analyse how the issue connects to multiple contributing factors (like determinants of health) and show how different elements interact to create or worsen the problem. Excellence: You critically examine the attitudes and values surrounding the issue, and evaluate the broader implications for New Zealand's health equity and wellbeing.

Question 4

What mistakes do students typically make in AS 91466?

Accepted Answer

1. Choosing a topic that is too vague or general (e.g. 'healthy eating') instead of investigating a specific, clear nutritional issue 2. Providing only one type of evidence—either statistics OR anecdotal information—rather than mixing data and qualitative examples to build a complete picture 3. Missing the connection between the nutritional issue and the wider social, economic, cultural, or environmental factors that drive it

Nutrition investigation

Your assessment resources

Videos & study resources

More in this subject

Other Home Economics standards · Level 3 · Year 13

Foundations — Home Economics Level 2 · Year 12

Related standards