Question 1

What is NCEA AS 91610 about?

Accepted Answer

This is a Year 13 internal assessment worth 6 credits. You design something (a product, system, or outcome) from concept stage, thinking carefully about whether it truly fits its purpose — not just 'does it work?' but also whether it's socially acceptable, culturally appropriate, sustainable, safe, and ethical. You research the problem, generate and test design ideas, get feedback from real stakeholders, do functional modelling (trying out ideas to see if they work in practice), and end up with a well-communicated final conceptual design that you can explain and justify.

Question 2

What do students need to do for AS 91610?

Accepted Answer

1. Research your design context thoroughly, including looking at existing similar products or outcomes and understanding the broader environment your design will exist in. 2. Generate multiple design ideas and evaluate them against your brief — not just on technical grounds but also considering social, cultural, ethical, sustainability, health and safety, and life-cycle factors. 3. Do functional modelling — practical testing or prototyping of your developing ideas — to gather real evidence about whether they will work and be accepted. 4. Collect feedback from stakeholders (real people affected by or involved with your design) and use that evidence to inform your decisions. 5. Communicate your final conceptual design clearly, using sketches, diagrams, written descriptions, technical drawings, or models. 6. Explain how your proposed design has the potential to meet your brief in the broadest sense.

Question 3

What's the difference between Achieved, Merit, and Excellence for AS 91610?

Accepted Answer

Achieved: You generate and evaluate design ideas using research and functional modelling. You get stakeholder feedback and use it. You clearly communicate a final conceptual design and explain how it could meet your brief, including broader fitness-for-purpose considerations (not just technical function). Merit: On top of Achieved, you show ongoing exploration — you keep testing and refining ideas throughout the process, not just at the start. You use growing evidence from research, modelling, and stakeholder feedback to evaluate how well your proposed outcome could meet the brief. Excellence: On top of Merit, you synthesise all your evidence — you bring together research, functional modelling, and stakeholder feedback in a way that strongly substantiates (proves with depth) why your final design has the potential to meet the brief. Your reasoning is thorough, well-connected, and shows deep understanding of all the broader fitness-for-purpose factors.

Question 4

What mistakes do students typically make in AS 91610?

Accepted Answer

1. Only considering whether the design works technically — ignoring broader fitness-for-purpose factors like sustainability, cultural appropriateness, ethics, health and safety, or life cycle. 2. Collecting stakeholder feedback but not actually using it to change or evaluate design decisions — feedback needs to visibly influence your process. 3. Doing research and modelling only once at the start rather than continuously throughout the design process (this limits you to Achieved at best). 4. Presenting a final design without clearly explaining how and why it meets the brief — the explanation and justification must be explicit, not assumed. 5. Functional modelling that is too shallow — trying something once and moving on, rather than using it as real evidence to evaluate and refine ideas. 6. Not communicating the final conceptual design in enough detail — it needs to show how the outcome would look AND function, not just one or the other.

Conceptual design

Your assessment resources

More in this subject

Other Technology standards · Level 3 · Year 13

Foundations — Technology Level 2 · Year 12

Videos & study resources

Related standards